1/4/2023 0 Comments Supreme week 5![]() ![]() ![]() What separates Supreme from other brands of its ilk is its ability to satisfy the needs of so many consumers with products that fit their style. From the downtown New York skaters it was originally intended for and inspired by to streetwear enthusiasts looking for cool graphic tees to match their sneakers to those simply looking for the perfect hoodie, Supreme serves its purpose. Over the years, Supreme’s audience has grown to include all walks of life. The skaters, the notoriously blasé employees, combined with a location that wasn’t nearly as policed as it is today, made Supreme a hub for the kind of youth that made up a fringe culture then, and the mainstream culture now. Though there were no lines outside just yet, the energy surrounding the store was palpable. The first thing Supreme sold was cool itself. Well before group chats, message boards and social media, the Supreme store, on Lafayette and Spring in New York’s SoHo neighborhood, quickly became the place to hang out for New York’s downtown skate community. This case law bears many similarities to the issue at hand and is specifically applicable to using a Global Positioning System (GPS) to track a suspect’s movements.After gaining over a decade of experience in the fashion retail industry at Parachute, Union and Stussy, James Jebbia founded Supreme in 1994. In considering this matter the Court reviewed the decision found in United States v. For this section, I will examine the validity and legality of the Officer’s employment of the “Bloodhound” device and the subsequent evidence obtained from it. Then, using this information, the Officers were able to obtain a search and seizure warrant. Officers later obtained additional data from the “Bloodhound” devise that apparently identified the presence of controlled dangerous substances, such as marijuana, and other substances known to be used in the distribution of controlled dangerous substances. ![]() The Capital City Officers subsequently utilized the data retrieved from the “Bloodhound” device to track Defendant Dipster and his associates. Capital City Police Officers Do-Right and Justice had placed a “Bloodhound” electronic surveillance device onto a vehicle operated by Defendant Dripster but registered to another party. I will render the majority opinion in this mock case in the following paragraphs. In doing so, the Court will consider an accepted statement of facts, as posted on the University of Arizona Global Campus website entitled “Supreme Court Option,” and apply the applicable case law to render a decision. To accomplish this, the case must be reviewed starting when the Capital City police initially contacted the defendants. ![]() Additionally, the Court is to consider whether the death penalty sentence was appropriately handed down. Dripster, Dummy, and Stupido, the Court is to consider the validity of the evidence presented that was gathered through electronic devices, interrogations, and a search warrant. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |